exclusionary rule (evidence)

Offers a critical analysis of Dollree Mapp's Supreme Court case against unlawful search and seizure methods and its link to the constitutional battle over privacy rights.

This book shows how the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution has been historically interpreted by the judicial system and presents cases which illustrate how it is currently being applied.

A collection of original documents and interviews that explore the historical, legal, and political significance of the search-and-seizure case Mapp v. Ohio, in which Dollree Mapp fought to protect her civil liberties after an illegal police search.

The landmark Supreme Court case that dealt with drawing the line between legal and illegal searches of private residences and what evidence obtained from such searches is admissible in court.